Budget comparison snapshot (2014 to 2026)

ISRO vs SC/ST Budget Growth

A focused look at how two public expenditure heads diverged over a 12-year window, using the same units for a direct read.

Headline takeaway

SC/ST outpaced ISRO by 2.42x in growth multiple.

ISRO Growth

27.3%

1.27x since 2014

SC/ST Growth

208.2%

3.08x since 2014

Budget levels (USD billions)

2014

$2014 dollars, as provided

ISRO

$1.10B

SC/ST

$11.65B

2026

$2026 dollars, as provided

ISRO

$1.40B

SC/ST

$35.90B

Growth summary (2014-2026)
ISRO absolute change+$0.30B

CAGR: 2.0% per year

SC/ST absolute change+$24.25B

CAGR: 9.8% per year

Ratio (SC/ST vs ISRO)10.59x25.64x

Gap widened by 15.05x over 12 years.

All figures are expressed in USD billions for easy comparison, based on the supplied values.
Key insights

The SC/ST allocation grew more than three times over the period, while ISRO grew just over a quarter. This shifts the balance of these two heads substantially in favor of social welfare allocation.

In 2014, SC/ST spending was roughly 10.59x the size of ISRO. By 2026, the ratio expands to 25.64x.

The growth gap is not just percentage-based: the absolute increase in SC/ST allocation is$24.25B versus $0.30B for ISRO.

What this highlights

Budget prioritization shifted visibly

The SC/ST budget accelerated both in percent and absolute terms, emphasizing redistribution and social programs.

ISRO growth stayed incremental

ISRO saw modest expansion, with funding rising by about 27.3% over the window.

Gap widened substantially

The SC/ST-to-ISRO ratio grew by 15.05x, making the difference more pronounced in 2026.